Resource

Resource Committee Members

 * Ed Nelson || Resource || Edgar.Nelson@fhsdschools.org ||
 * Maria Digrispino || Resource || maria.digrispino@fhsdschools.org ||
 * Cindy Reilmann || Resource || cindy.reilmann@fhsdschools.org ||

=__TFA 4 – Resource Distribution and Use __= **Goal**:.

Ø  || Ø Ø  || =__ The following pages contain the action items, progress measurements and evaluation criteria for each objective. Evaluation of each goal will be conducted in the manner specified in the section titled ‘Communications, Monitoring and Evaluation: on page 37. Also reference Appendix E. __ = = =  = __ Technology Focus Area 4 – Resource Distribution and Use __ = The following tables list the 2010 - 2013 Technology Goals, Objectives, and Activities. The Committee reviewed each objective and activity and reported on the status.
 * Objective #1**: . (CSIP 1, 4, 5)
 * Objective #2:** . (CSIP 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
 * Objective #3**: . (CSIP 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
 * Table 2: Strengths and Weaknesses **
 * Strengths || Weaknesses ||
 * Ø

**Goal 1: **. **Objective 2:**. (CSIP 1,) (MSIP 1.1,) = = = = = =
 * Strategy: **
 * Data Resource:** Student to computer ratio
 * ** Action Step/ Activity ** || ** Time Line ** || ** Responsible Person ** || ** Review Dates ** || ** Est. Cost ** || ** Funding Source ** || ** Progress Measurements ** ||
 * **Strategy** || **Action Step/ Activity** || **Timeline** || **Person Responsible** || **Cost/Resources** || **Progress Measurements** || **Professional Development** ||


 * ** GOAL 1: ** || || || || || || || || ||
 * |||||||||||||||||||| To establish both short and long term financial plans identifying the necessary resources to fund Technology objectives for the District ||
 * |||||| **DATA SUPPORT:** || || || || || || || ||
 * || |||| **District Budget** || || || || || || || ||
 * || || || **//09-10//** || **//08-09//** || **//07-08//** || **//06-07//** || **//05-06//** || || || ||
 * || || || **//Budget//** || **//Actual//** || **//Actual//** || **//Actual//** || **//Actual//** || || || ||
 * || || **// GF //** || $ 56,526,045 ||  $ 58,286,140 ||  $ 53,616,828 ||  $ 50,920,241 ||  $ 58,019,948 || || || ||
 * || || **// CPF //** || $ 6,171,406 ||  $ 6,904,666 ||  $ 3,260,666 ||  $ 4,796,416 ||  $ 3,319,682 || || || ||
 * || || || $ 62,697,451 ||  $ 65,190,806 ||  $ 56,877,494 ||  $ 55,716,657 ||  $ 61,339,630 || || || ||
 * || || **// AV //** || $ 2,260,872,690 ||  $ 2,393,832,914 ||  $ 2,349,902,184 ||  $ 2,102,437,860 ||  $ 2,023,111,863 || || || ||
 * || || **// TR //** || $ 4.7291 ||  $ 4.4541 ||  $ 4.4522 ||  $ 4.7176 ||  $ 4.7168 || || || ||
 * || |||||| **Technology Budget History** || || || || || || ||
 * || || ** 1 ** || $ 729,100 ||  $ 1,387,100 || || || |||||| **  Need to add Capital Projects to these  ** ||
 * ||  ||   ||  $ 2,454,731 ||  $ 3,155,555 ||  $ 2,377,080 ||  $ 1,194,448 ||  $ 2,748,023 || || || ||
 * || || || $ 3,183,831 ||  $ 4,542,655 ||  $ 2,377,080 ||  $ 1,194,448 ||  $ 2,748,023 || || || ||
 * || || || 5.08% || 6.97% || 4.18% || 2.14% || 4.48% || || || ||
 * || || **2** |||| **//Tax revenue generated by levy://** || **// $ 0.10 //** || || || || || ||
 * || || || $ 2,260,873 ||  $ 2,393,833 ||  $ 2,349,902 ||  $ 2,102,438 ||  $ 2,023,112 || || || ||
 * || |||||| Business Grant information || || || || || || ||
 * || |||| Erate information || || || || || || || ||
 * || |||||||||| MoreNet connection bandwidth and utilization information || || || || ||
 * || |||||||||||| Computer analyses: computer counts, age of computers, number of computers by room, || || || ||
 * || || **1** |||||||| // **9% of the computers in the District are 2001 or older** // || || || || ||
 * || || **2** |||||||| // **34.50% of the computers in the District are 2003 or older** // || || || || ||
 * || || **3** |||||||||| // **Per COT: State average is 2.47 students per computer; FHSD average is 3.9** // || || || ||
 * || || **4** |||||||||||| // **Per COT: State average is 2.65 students per instructional computer; FHSD average is 3.8** // || || ||
 * || || **5** |||||||||| // **Per COT: State average is 4.35 students per classroom computer; FHSD average is 4.9** // || || || ||
 * || || **6** |||||||||||| // **Per COT: Over 94 percent of districts have board-approved education technology standards** // || || ||
 * || || **7** |||||||| // **Per COT: 81 percent of buildings support distance learning systems** // || || || || ||
 * |||||| ** OBJECTIVE 1: ** || || || || || || || ||
 * || |||||||||||||||||| Determine the level of commitment by the Francis Howell School District to fund technology and determine funding sources. ||
 * || |||| ** STRATEGIES: ** || || || || || || || ||
 * || || |||||||||||||| A dedicated funding source will be identified to support Technology resources || ||
 * || || |||| ** ACTION STEPS: ** || || || || || || ||
 * || || || 1 |||||||||||||| Create a technology fund with dedicated resources ||
 * || || || 2 |||||||||||||| Ensure the budget for technology is sufficient to obtain the hardware, software, infrastructure, connectivity, and maintenance needed to support all educational programs and administrative services. ||
 * || || || 3 |||||||||||||| Ensure TCO (total cost of ownership) that includes acquisition, required connectivity and infrastructure, support personnel and supplies, replacement or updating hardware, required software and peripherals. ||
 * || || || 4 |||||||||||||| Apply for funding through the Universal Service Fund (eRate) each year to obtain and support technology resources. ||
 * || || || 5 |||||||||||||| Continue to seek supplemental funding through available federal, state, local and business grants. ||
 * |||||| ** OBJECTIVE 2: ** || || || || || || || ||
 * || |||||||||||||||||| Determine technology models for support and instructional areas at elementary, middle and high school level and establish both short and long term technology plans for all buildings. ||
 * || |||| ** STRATEGIES: ** || || || || || || || ||
 * || || |||||||||||||| The District will strive to identify and establish standards for essential hardware, software, infrastructure, and connectivity to support high quality instruction and high level academic performance throughout the district. || ||
 * || || |||| ** ACTION STEPS: ** || || || || || || ||
 * || || || 1 |||||||||||||| Continue to analyze internet connection bandwidth and infrastructure requirements annually and update as required (servers, switches, wireless equipment, security, Internet content filtering, and other system software and resources). ||
 * || || || 2 |||||||||||||| Define minimum technology model for classrooms and specialty areas ||
 * || || || 3 |||||||||||||| Define ideal technology model for classrooms and specialty areas ||
 * || || || 4 |||||| Conduct a printer versus copier utilization analysis || || || || ||
 * || || || 5 |||||||||||||| Provide copiers in each building that can be accessed through the data network for printing and supplement with network printers as needed to maintain sufficient printing capacity. ||
 * || |||| ** STRATEGIES: ** || || || || || || || ||
 * || || |||||||||||||||| Up-to-date technology tools and resources will be readily available to support curriculum objectives and parent involvement ||
 * || || |||| ** ACTION STEPS: ** || || || || || || ||
 * || || || 1 |||||||||||||| Implement a web-based tool that allows parents to pay for all student fees online ||
 * || || || 2 |||||||||| Ensure that technolgoy is represented during the curriculum review process || || ||
 * |||||| ** OBJECTIVE 3: ** || || || || || || || ||
 * || |||||||||||||||||| To evaluate and implement a computer lease/purchase plan in conjunction with a refurbish/obsolescence component. ||
 * || |||| ** STRATEGIES: ** || || || || || || || ||
 * || || |||||||||||||| The District will develop a technology policy which will ensure district-wide standards including replacement cycle and classroom requirements || ||
 * || || |||| ** ACTION STEPS: ** || || || || || || ||
 * || || || 1 |||||||||||||| Determine a comprehensive lease refurbish plan ||
 * || || || 2 |||||||||||||| Maintain a four-year computer replacement cycle that ensures systematic and timely deployment of the new computers as well as the relocation of the replaced computers in classrooms for student use ||
 * || || || 1 |||||||||||||| Determine a comprehensive lease refurbish plan ||
 * || || || 2 |||||||||||||| Maintain a four-year computer replacement cycle that ensures systematic and timely deployment of the new computers as well as the relocation of the replaced computers in classrooms for student use ||