Student+Learning

​ Student Learning Committee Members

 * ** Jill Kelly ** || Student Learning || jill.kelly@fhsdschools.org ||
 * V. Todd Bizzell || Student Learning || Vernon.Bizzell@fhsdschools.org ||
 * David Blanchard || Student Learning || dblanchard@msn.com ||
 * David Doering || Student Learning || david@learnovator.com ||
 * Sherri Kulpa || Student Learning || kulpash@sbcglobal.net ||
 * Travis Bracht || Student Learning || Nathan.Bracht@fhsdschools.org ||

Saring Information from Todd Bizzell I beleive we need to look at these Issues that impact student achevement. Critical Issue: Using Technology to Improve Student Achievement []

Ideas Mentioned at last Meeting:

**ebooks keyboarding required in elementary embedding technology into curriculum** vertically develop information and technology literacy standards and embed them into the curriculum  =__TFA 1 – Student Learning  __= = = **Goal:** .Student performance will increase.


 * Objective #1**: . (CSIP 1)
 * Objective #2:** . (CSIP 1)
 * Objective #3**: . (CSIP 1)

** Table 1: Strengths and Weaknesses ** Ø  || Ø Ø  ||
 * Strengths || Weaknesses ||
 * Ø

The following pages contain the action items, progress measurements and evaluation criteria for each objective. Evaluation of each goal will be conducted in the manner specified in the section titled ‘Communications, Monitoring and Evaluation: on page 37. Also reference Appendix E.  = __ Technology Focus Area 1 – Student Learning __ = The following tables list the 2010 - 2013 Technology Goals, Objectives, and Activities. The Committee reviewed each objective and activity and reported on the status.

**Goal 1: **. **Objective 1:** Through the curriculum revision process, each curriculum will embed at least one activity that incorporates technology skills. (CSIP 1,) (MSIP 1.1,) learning activities that encorporate technology skills. || Begin 2010 || Educational Technology Specialist working in conjunction with content leaders and curriculum project teams. || Throughout the year as curriculum is reviewed by ETS, teachers, content leaders, CAC and ASPC. || Dedicate ETS time to support content leaders and project teams. PD for content leaders and project teams. || Technology and academics. || Monitor progress each time a curriculum is going through the review process. ||
 * Strategy: **
 * Data Resource:** Curriculum documents, MAP scores, EOC scores, Rigby Reads, Study Island
 * ** Action Step / Activity ** || ** Time Line ** || ** Responsible Person ** || ** Review Dates ** || ** Est. Cost ** || ** Funding Source ** || ** Progress Measurements ** ||
 * Curriculum project teams will embed
 * Provide teachers an opportunity to submit technology based learning activities that could be integrated into the curriculum. || Begin 2010 || ETS working in collaboration with teachers and content leaders. || Set up a submission date each quarter. || Dedicated ETS time to support teachers, content leaders and review submissions. || Technology and academics. || Review submissions each quarter. ||
 * Provide technology based curriculum and assessment support opportunities to students. (i.e. Study Island, ALS, etc.) || 2010 || Technology and Academic Directors || Quarterly || Funds to cover the purchase of these items. || Technology and academics || Monitor progress on a quarterly basis ||
 * Professional development will support teachers' implementation of new curriculum. || Begin 2010 || ETS, content leaders and project teams || Annual with follow up as needed || Costs associated with providing stipend summer PD or release time for teachers || Technology and academics || Teacher feedback after PD ||
 * Student performance on assessment items that were instructed by using technology related activities can be analyzed by teams of teachers. || Begin 2010 || Teachers, ETS and content leaders || Each quarter or as assessments are given || Dedicated ETS time to support || Technology and academics || Track student achievement versus expected achievement over time and adjust ||
 * **Strategy** || **Action Step/ Activity** || **Timeline** || **Person Responsible** || **Cost/Resources** || **Progress Measurements** || **Professional Development** ||

**Objective 2:** Integrate the Information, Communications Technology and Media Literacy grade level expectations into K-12 curriculum. (CSIP 1,) (MSIP 1.1,)
 * Strategy: Integrate DESE Media literacy expectations through vertical alignment and articulation of technology skills. **
 * Data Resource:** Curriculum documents, MAP scores, EOC scores, Rigby Reads, Study Island
 * ** Action Step / Activity ** || ** Time Line ** || ** Responsible Person ** || ** Review Dates ** || ** Est. Cost ** || ** Funding Source ** || ** Progress Measurements ** ||
 * Identify where these GLEs can be implemented into curricula in grades K-12 and decide if there are other skills (such as social networking) not listed in the GLEs that need to be added. || Begin 2010 || ETS, content leaders and teachers || Quarterly || ETS, content leader and teacher time || Technology and academics || Monitor progress towards end goal each quarter ||
 * Develop a K-12 scope and sequence for the teaching and learning of technology skills that can be integrated into curriculum. || Begin 2010 || ETS, content leaders and teachers || Quarterly || ETS, content leader and teacher time || Technology and academics || Monitor progress towards end goal each quarter ||
 * **Strategy** || **Action Step/ Activity** || **Timeline** || **Person Responsible** || **Cost/Resources** || **Progress Measurements** || **Professional Development** ||

**Objective 3:**
 * Strategy:**


 * Data Resource:**
 * ** Action Step / Activity ** || ** Time Line ** || ** Responsible Person ** || ** Review Dates ** || ** Est. Cost ** || ** Funding Source ** || ** Progress Measurements ** ||
 * **Strategy** || **Action Step/ Activity** || **Timeline** || **Person Responsible** || **Cost/Resources** || **Progress Measurements** || **Professional Development** ||